Archive for the ‘Web Design’ Category

stfu, noobs

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

A conversation transpired the other day in which a colleague of mine remarked that he’d had it with “hacks” in our industry – that is, those who call themselves developers and designers but still use recycled code, un-secure scripts, and kludged together markup. He complained that there should be an education requirement (like that of doctors, lawyers and engineers) and that the lack of professional underpinnings was killing our industry. He argues:

“There’s such a low entry level to our industry, all you need is photoshop & wordpress to build a site”

“… [T]here are hacks in the webdesign/deve industry (like other industries) and education would help weed them out.”

“Anyone can participate even if they’ve never built a site before or their a seasoned vet.”

These arguments (and I hear them frequently amongst professionals in my field, especially after a few years of making a good, honest living doing this) are worrisome to me. I myself did not earn any degree in my industry (for those that don’t know: I have a B.S. in Microbiology and Immunology. NOT Web development. NOT Advertising. NOT Computer science.) and in fact, most of my most trusted colleagues didn’t either. Ours is a very, very young industry and we should do well to remember that our pioneers are not so old yet. Even surgery was once the domain of the barber. I think the low level of entry is amazingly effective in bringing in new talent who really want to understand and change the industry in new and powerful ways. What first got you into the Web field?

Education, to me, seems a horrifyingly poor way to “weed out” those hacks in the industry. High-powered ADAs who help put away mass murders, rapists, and pedophiles went to law school. The ambulance chasers and DWI-Dudes also went to law school. Education seems to be a rather poor way to separate the hacks from the pros – there are plenty of diploma-factories out there who are all to happy to give you a slip of paper giving you a degree in “Web Paging” in exchange for cold cash. The education is nice, but it’s my belief that Mark Twain was right: “I have never let my schooling get in the way of my education.” I myself teach classes on development and accessibility, I give back by posting on forums and message boards, I try to attend meetups and conferences to learn and share my knowledge with others because it keeps my skills sharp as well as opening me up to learn something from those with different life experiences.

The last point really gets under my skin. I feel that an argument like this is birthed from time removed from a time when the professional was starting out. I will be the first to admit I came in through the hobby and hacker route – I was a little script kiddy doing my best. I learned from stealing source code, playing with scripts from other sites and honestly hacking crap together until I understood how it worked. Tim Berners Lee started this little experiment to help researchers publish content to a hub. This isn’t the Sorbonne, it’s the Wild West – it’s open and free and it’s what we all love deep down in our hearts. I feel the day that we treat this as an elites-only walled garden, is the day our profession will have fallen to so much accounting and pixel pushing. I know the concern is that it lowers professionalism for those of us who make money doing this professionally, but it’s true for any industry. There are those who will prefer the cheap suits at Sears, but there are plenty who respect and want a bespoke piece from Savile Row. The cream always rises to the top, so they say.

So I welcome all the hackers, hacks, script kiddies, punks, and noobs. There’s always more to learn, more that noobs can teach us about ourselves and our established modes of thinking and that’s frankly better for all of us.

Put This On Episode 2

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Put This On, Episode 2: Shoes from Put This On on Vimeo.

I’ve been a huge fan of Put This On since I saw them on Boing Boing for their first episode. It’s a Web series about “dressing like a grown-up”. I donated to them when they crowd-sourced the funding of their first season and have been blown away by the quality of their blog. More than just being a sartorial blog, it’s an amazingly well produced video series. Adam Lisagor (of You Look Nice Today) and Jesse Thorn (of Sound of Young America) help produce a stylish guide to style that is frank, accessible, and fun to interact with and I wish them the best.

Just remember:

ask your doctor about scuzz (in the brouging)

Being Gorgeous

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

As the wonderful Mr. Fry points out, the secret to being gorgeous is in one’s attitude of mind. By being mindful of good design choices and good interactions, users will tell us that we are wonderful. The secret is really in mindfulness – the more time and effort we put into designing quality interactions with touches and flourishes of UX goodies, the better our products become. The late, great John Slatin once told me that he felt that those who were mindful of accessibility and usability were so often far and away better than their peers at those areas. Because the Web is a mutable form, because users are constantly interacting with the implementation, and because feedback is easier and faster than ever before, we need every facet to gleam, every seam to be stitched and everything to look, well, gorgeous.

I’ve been thinking a lot about attention to details, something I’ve always struggled with (even though I know when I do it I’m so much better off because I take more pride in the thing I’ve created), and I’m making a larger push in my design and development to really focus on those details and little things that don’t so much make people notice them, but feel at ease because everything is just right.

Thinking about little details in a broad way helps one understand the full scope. If, for instance, a user is making a purchase on a site for the first time and there are lots of well done photos of the object or all the buttons fit the site look or the breadcrumbs show the steps a user needs to take; then there is a slow building of confidence – the user now trusts the seller because if the process was so tight on the details, the worries of shipping, security, etc are lessened (for better or worse) and customer confidence improves.

So let’s take some of Mr. Fry’s advice – the more we pay attention to making our interfaces and processes gorgeous, the more people will tell us so, which is the secret, really.

Art for Art

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

I’m a fan of good art. I’ve got art in my home, I love going to galleries in every city I visit, and I have friends and family as accomplished artists. I like art because it allows for everyone who views it to have just a second of meditative contemplation on how a piece affects them personally.

One of my good and dear friends, Andrew Tolentino, is one such amazing artist. Andrew really got fierce into his art in high school, derived amazing cultural and artistic inspiration in college, and then started turning his passion into a movement after graduation. Andrew uses mixed media to bring to life Bosch-like landscapes, cartoonish sketches, and all around wonderful things.

I’ve commissioned art from Andrew before (when we were in college he did an oil on canvas of a stylized Sumo wrestler that now hangs in my office) and I felt it time to do it again with a piece based on his interpretation of my personal company, match head creative. I wanted it to be a large piece, something that he had full control over, using the logo as the launch pad. Andrew brought up an interesting notion: he needed his own website for a portfolio, and proposed a trade, my craft for his

I normally don’t do work for trade, but being able to create a piece of functional art for an artist in exchange for a piece of art? Yes, I think I can do that. Please have a gander and explore the twisted, fun mind of my dear friend Andrew. GET TOLENTINOED.

of Makers and Managers, Cabbages and Kings

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

I’ve been thinking about scheduling a lot lately, what with SxSW going on TOMORROW and all. I’m juggling a few projects at my daytime contract and a few for my personal business. I feel that some of the reason I’ve not been at the top of my game lately stems from how I schedule blocks of time to get into the flow.

I was reminded a few days ago of Paul Graham’s essay on Maker vs. Manager Schedules and I thought about my personal business. I often times need to be a maker and a manager – to need to have meetings and also give myself enough time to work effectively (and one assumes, live a life in between). I think what I’m going to do is schedule one day out of the week when I need to have a meeting and keep the rest of the week open to have some bit of flow.

There have been some awesome co-working spots that have opened up in Austin recently and talking with some of the people who run them about getting some time to get some real work done once a week or so. I think if I make myself have a standard meeting location, I have time to do managerial duties while leaving the rest of the evenings free to focus on actually making things (a persona I was working on should’ve been finished in one night instead of three).

I really want my business to succeed, I just need to be more effective in how I structure workflow so that I’m not doing more work with less results. We all make better ’stuff’ when we get in the zone, into the flow of things, so the more often I have batches of time, the better off I think my work will be.